Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : VGAM - Virtual Gaming -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: beats_the_s_p500 who wrote (162)	6/18/2000 1:21:00 PM
From: THOMAS GOODRICH	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 216

I believe the recent editorials and SEC involvement in VGAM speaks for itself. The fact that anyone paid anything for touting on a web site whether or not it came in the form of cash or equity from the principals, the company or a related third party should be regarded as suspicious. I am aware of the "much broader IR campaign on the way" and in fact know some of the substance. What I find particularly disturbing is when a publicly traded company issues PR claiming ownership in stuff they have no ownership rights to IMO should be perceived as a Red Flag to investors. Perhaps the company has turned over a new leaf in the last thirty days or so, if so please let me know!<g> P.S. Have you changed your alias on SI?