Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Rock Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocket Red who wrote (1961)	6/18/2000 1:38:00 PM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1996

In my Books Trace Elements means nothing more than a point of interest in what your looking for. Now we are getting somewhere.ALL drill results are "material information" therefore they must be reported. The accepted "norm" for reporting is in g/mt if the grade is large enough or PPM's/PPB's if the grade is low so RKR was compelled to list them as such. All of the previous discoveries in Chile and elsewhere have all ended up with PPM/PPB measurements in some of their holes. If a company has reported many holes with g/t and runs into a PPM/PPB hole, they generally will just report it as a dud. But, when a company is embarking on a drill program, if they run into a dud first, then they report it in PPM/PPB In the end, Argentina Gold had "basically" 85 holes of crappola before they hit the big one. I bailed on the early results....after about 25 holes....in hindsight that wasn't smart. That doesn't mean that will happen to RKR but I'm not making the same mistake twice. I will wait for the results and then superimpose the acetate of the drtill holes over the IP and either "flee or stay" based on that. the Chief