Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (44896)	6/18/2000 2:58:00 PM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Re: I would suggest... Zeev, Please look at my post again - I was in no way implying any insider knowledge to you. Only first class technical analysis. One of the ways in which technical analysis works is by assuming that there are others in the market that know facts that the analyst has no access to. By carefully observing trends in a stock that haven't another explanation, that knowledge can (sometimes) be inferred by a talented technical analyst like yourself (or my broker - just not by me!). Hence the expression "when the technical analysis and the fundamental analysis disagree, believe the technical analysis". Which is another way of saying there is missing information from the fundamental analysis that is being picked up by the technical analysis. Which must, by definition, be insider knowledge (or else it would be available to the fundamental analyst). But has only been inferred by the technical analyst from publicly available price and volume moves. The technical analyst is, quite legally and very ethically, picking up signals from trades made by those who are neither. OK? Regards, Dan