SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J Langholtz who wrote (1784)6/18/2000 4:37:00 PM
From: Jon Koplik  Respond to of 12239
 
(long) NYT article about summer jobs / young people.

June 17, 2000

The Summer Job Loses Its Status as Rite of
Youth

By MARY WILLIAMS WALSH

Jack Brooks may look a middle-aged stockbroker on the surface, but
beneath the starched shirt and tie beats the heart of a hometown hero,
forged more than a quarter-century ago on his first summer job.

"Lifeguarding was my induction into life," said Mr. Brooks, who at 16 joined
the Beach Patrol in Ocean City, N.J., and today is an associate vice president
for investments at Morgan Stanley Dean Witter. "I drank my first beer as a
lifeguard. I had my first romantic encounter as a lifeguard. It was much
more than a summer job. It was more than I ever dreamed."

Time was, much of teenage America would have agreed: lifeguarding was the
pluperfect summer billet.

Today, though, lifeguard jobs go begging, to the point where Ocean City has
dipped deep into its personnel files and asked old-timers to come back and fill
the empty stations. Mr. Brooks will return this summer on weekends, as will
moonlighting lawyers, doctors, engineers and casino floorwalkers.

"If we had to depend on teenaged kids, we'd be hurting," said Bud McKinley,
Ocean City's assistant captain for operations.

As go the beaches of the Jersey Shore, so go the workplaces of the nation.
For the last 10 years, fewer teenagers and young adults have been venturing
into the summer work force. Last year, even with desperate managers
dangling finder's fees, tuition plans and other lures, just 62 percent of
America's 16 million people between 16 and 19 years old were in the labor
force, compared with a high of 71.8 percent in 1978, and the lowest
percentage since July 1965.

The trend is most pronounced among young men, whose summer
employment rate of 65 percent is down from 73.5 percent in 1989 and the
lowest since the Bureau of Labor Statistics started keeping track in 1948.

The decline indicates that the lengthy economic expansion has given growing
numbers of families the means to support their children as they learn new
languages, travel and undertake other adventures, and many parents are
proud to be able to offer their offspring opportunities they never had.

But the shift away from summer jobs also suggests that tens of thousands of
teenagers are missing out on what some consider a hallowed American
coming-of-age experience and, arguably, a social leveler that gives the
college-bound a fleeting taste of working-class life.

Droves of teenagers and young adults have been signing up for summer
school, from remedial reading and math to advanced-placement courses and
exotic enrichment programs. In July 1994, 19.5 percent of Americans aged
16 to 19 were in school. By July 1999, 26.8 percent were.

A decade of unparalleled affluence may be prompting some parents to give
youngsters money, reducing their need to work. For other teenagers, the
boom still means working, but in jobs that put them on career tracks more
quickly, not in the sweaty, low-paid and mind-numbing slots that have long
been the lot of many.

Rapidly rising college tuitions may be turning off teenagers, since a summer's
earnings will no longer make much of a dent in expenses. The current intense
competition for university admissions also appears to be a factor, with
teenagers using summers to add sizzle to their applications. It is assumed that
music camp or a hands-on biology lab will impress more than a stint stocking
shelves in a supermarket.

"It could be the result of the high-stakes testing that's been instituted in a lot
of the states," said William Rodgers, chief economist at the Labor
Department.

For adolescent-development specialists, the waning of the summer job comes
as a surprise. Teachers, psychologists and occupational-health experts have
been arguing for years that young Americans are working far too much for
their own good.

But with a tide of teenagers turning away from summer jobs, some are
raising a new concern.

"It could mean that the social divide that's happening gets worse," suggested
Jeffrey A. Joerres, president and chief executive of Manpower Inc., the big
temporary-employment company. Mr. Joerres worked as a house painter on
his summer vacations, he recalled, and bonded with a crew of tattooed and
ponytailed men who were not going to college.

"If somebody asked me, 'What did you learn?' I'd probably say, 'Well, I
learned to put up scaffolding,' " Mr. Joerres said. "But in fact, I was learning
other lessons. There are some life experiences that go unlearned if you take
the professional track all your life."

In today's tight labor market, though, college students who seek summer
work through Manpower expect to get serious, white-collar positions, Mr.
Joerres said, and they are not disappointed.

"They've really shot themselves in the foot," said Mr. Brooks, who traces
much of who he is today to his time under the sun as a lifeguard.

Mr. Brooks revered his first boss, "a big, barrel-chested guy who was in the
Navy," he said.

"He had a soft side, but you always knew who was boss. I think, in a lot of
ways, the management style I've adopted in my life is a lot like that old
captain."

Not only that, Mr. Brooks said, but it was a partner from that first summer
job who got him into financial services, and former lifeguards still round out
his client list today.

But others see few such benefits in putting teenagers to work.

"When you have your kids working as soon as they're 13, 14 years old, the
spring just goes out of their step," said Theresa Miller, a mother and writer in
Tatamy, Pa.

Mrs. Miller's father had to work throughout high school to buy clothes, she
said, and felt robbed of an adolescence. So when she was in high school, he
let her try a paper route, but stopped her when she started looking tired. He
promised she would not have to work again until she was out of college.
Now she wants to do the same for her son, who went to science camp last
summer and will study music this season.

"We've counseled him to be a kid as long as he can, and as long as we can
afford it," she said.

There is a large and contentious body of scholarship on whether teenagers
should or should not be working.

Some research shows that working adolescents get worse grades, sleep less
and are more prone to dropping out of school. But other studies show that
working teenagers stay in school longer, flounder less, do just as much
homework and enjoy better mental health.

The effects seem to depend on the nature of the workplace. There is some
evidence that young people thrive in well-ordered workplaces, where their
assignments are clear and mature supervision is never far away.

But high stress and a lack of job supervision have been found to cause
depression in teenagers, and the effects can linger for years.

Barbara Schneider, a University of Chicago sociologist, conducted a survey
of 7,000 teenagers and concluded, among other things, that the healthy,
teenager-friendly workplace is getting harder and harder to find.

Consider the car-loving youth who, 25 years ago, might have sought
satisfyingly greasy summer work in a filling station, changing oil and tuning
engines under the tutelage of an experienced mechanic.

Today, that youth probably cannot get such a job, Dr. Schneider said. Cars
come with modular components, and repair garages want mechanics with
junior college certificates.

And instead of avuncular mentors like Mr. Brooks's captain, today's
teenagers are apt to have supervisors not that much older than themselves,
Dr. Schneider said. They get little training, make mistakes, are yelled at by
customers. Then they quit in frustration.

"It's really problematic," Dr. Schneider said.

Randstad North America, an Atlanta-based company that provides temporary
staff members, recently studied generational attitudes and found that today's
teenagers, unlike their parents, want jobs where they are taught something.

"It's logical," said Daryl Evans, a Randstad marketing manager. "They grew
up in an environment of technology changing every 12 minutes. There's this
incredible motivation to keep up, or a fear of falling behind."

Sean Stevens, a junior at Georgetown University, is a good example. "I know
it sounds arrogant, but my time is worth more than $8 or $10 an hour," he
said. "I've got a whole lot of other things to do."

Mr. Stevens, who already speaks fluent Korean and Russian as well as good
Japanese, Spanish and German, is leaving this weekend for a summer at a
university in South Korea. He even managed to shoehorn in an internship at
the World Bank in the four weeks between spring finals and his trans-Pacific
flight.

"People want to make themselves look good on r‚sum‚s," Mr. Stevens said.
Just having a degree and a few summers waiting tables is no longer enough,
he said. "You have to have a selling point, something to distinguish you from
everybody else. You want to stand out."

But such sentiments do not always go down well with adults for whom
low-skilled summer jobs were enough.

"To just spend more time reading American history and playing soccer is not
the same as getting out into the world and having experiences," said David
Davenport, the departing president of Pepperdine University in California,
who admits he irritates faculty by asserting without end that he learned more
frying doughnuts in his father's bakery than in any university. "We're
crowding out the well-rounded development of our children."

Last summer, in keeping with his convictions, Dr. Davenport decided his
daughter, Kate, should get a job as a chambermaid, even though Kate wanted
to go to soccer camp.

"You'd think the world had come to an end," Dr. Davenport said. But he
persisted and Kate ended up stripping beds and cleaning rooms at the
conference center Pepperdine operates each summer on its Malibu campus.

Today, Kate does not even remember the fight about attending soccer camp.
A summer of hard work and low prestige have left her sounding like a
convert to her father's cause.

"At Malibu High School, most of the students were doing marine biology
camps and SAT prep classes," she said dismissively. "I don't miss that
environment at all."

Asked if her summer job gave her any thoughts about a career, the
17-year-old Ms. Davenport drew a blank. But as for what she plans to do this
summer, she did not miss a beat.

"I've heard the money in construction is good, $10 an hour to start," she said.
"I think it's important to know how to build things."

Copyright 2000 The New York Times Company



To: J Langholtz who wrote (1784)6/18/2000 4:46:00 PM
From: Jon Koplik  Respond to of 12239
 
If everyone else is going to pretend about W-CDMA, then Qualcomm is going to also pretend.

(This is my guess as to what is going on ...)

When a carrier has to decide how to deploy $800 million on some infrastructure for a wireless system, I suspect they will go with what is real, demonstrated, tested, etc.

That would be CDMA2000 stuff.

Jon.



To: J Langholtz who wrote (1784)6/19/2000 5:26:00 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Respond to of 12239
 
<IJ says that Q will be producing chips for WCDMA in 2001. If that's so, is WCDMA really vaporware?>

Vaporware means software announced, well in advance of any real product or sometimes even ahead of any development at all, with a view to dissuading competitors from entering the field or to get customers to delay adopting the competing product which would make it hard to get their business when the vaporware finally arrives.

Until software is actually demonstrated in a real 3D world, I think it's fair to call it vaporware.

VapourWear had a bit different meaning but much the same, when we discussed King Ericsson, standing naked before the world, wearing a fine raiment of golden robes, stitched together by some con artists who told everyone it was a beautiful cloak which stupid people could not see, but others could. The children of course called out "The King isn't wearing any clothes"!

Hence, VapourWear.

So yes, I'd say cdma2000 and W-CDMA are both still in the category of vaporware, but there is a major difference in that Ericsson and Nokia claimed, falsely and dishonestly and in their usual scummy way, that they don't need Q! technology to make their fantasy work.

Well, Ericsson caved in on the courthouse steps which proved the truthfulness of their false claims. Nokia is still pretending and so is the DS-CDMA gang, struggling to find a way of getting money from their great invention without killing the goose which they hope will lay golden eggs. There are so many of them trying to get a piece of the action that they'll have to charge royalties of about 20%!! MC-CDMA will work with just Q! and I suppose a couple of bells and whistles with a total royalty cost of about 5.6%.

Nokia and IDC are hoping to threaten Q! by the look of it, with legal action which won't get any further than Ericy's did, but if it causes even a slight delay in the demise of GSM it will be worth it to Nokia. Even a week's delay would be worth it in revenue to Nokia! They have a BIG GSM market share and are raking in $$billions!! They will be an also-ran in CDMA though with a good market share, but lower margins than they get with their GSM models.

Mqurice