Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (24946)	6/19/2000 11:37:00 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

One must go back even further to understand why AZNT ever filed the lawsuit in the first place. The company's decision to file the suit in the wrong jurisdiction appeared to me immediately that they did not consider the suit seriously. There never was any doubt about case law regarding this, and in fact their very weak attempt at justification with the use of case law was the same case law that we successfully referred to which proved that the case could not be heard in LV. There was no confusion over the understanding of the law on our part, nor should there have been for them. This was not in reality an AZNT lawsuit, but instead, a malicious lawsuit based on payback filed on behalf of those promoting the lawsuit, IMO. Why do I believe they were not serious and were only trying to hurt us? One does not file a lawsuit based on bogus information, nor for an unacceptable amount of $250,000,000. Can you imagine that argument in the courtroom? That was for headlines and had absolutely nothing to do with merit. What a shame it took up valuable court time. Until something good came out of it... BTW, if you review posts back then, I think I made it clear how I felt about calling AZNT: Message 7314632 To: Spider Valdez who wrote (16146) From: tonto Friday, Jan 15, 1999 7:32 PM ET Reply # of 24946 Spugsmart, I have no interest in calling and bickering. Strange comment,...again on your part. You came on this thread today and once again posted false posted information. You must get off on games. Just as on RMIL, you turn the focus to a conspiracy...effective...it keeps peoples attention off of focusing in on the corporate fundamentals. You are very wrong to lie. BTW, I stand by by sworn affidavit and have never spoken to Mike Sylver, Robert Qualey, nor ever harrassed any AZNT employee. Why did he claim that I had at the last minute? Why had he done something similar in a previous case and what was the outcome of that assertion?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (24946)	6/19/2000 9:57:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

lol, you forgot: SHELL & TOD PAULY CARRY ON ABOUT "ERROL" TO SCARE & INTIMIDATE SHAREHOLDERS ROFL!! Like the judge really cares about Fear of Hamsters.

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (24946)	3/3/2001 8:08:45 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

To:Spider Valdez who wrote (16212) From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell Monday, Jun 19, 2000 2:26 AM View Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25398 For some odd reason I decided to flip through the 42 pages of e-mails, courtesy of Pugs, AZNT included as an appendix to their "Plaintiff's Compliance with Court Order" filing regarding Sylver's perjurious testimony that Tod has called him and cursed him out (see: siliconinvestor.com. What struck me as odd was the date on many of the e-mails: January 15... 1999! I wondered why that might be so decided to see if there were any clues here on SI. Sure enough, I found this Pugs/Spider Valdez classic: To: tonto who wrote (16210) From: Spider Valdez Saturday, Jan 16, 1999 9:26 AM ET Reply #16212 of 24946 nothing brings me greater joy tonto guy then seeing you & this fbna penny stock basher face justice in a court of law. now you will be given that chance pauly! you will be able to expound upon your "reports" to the "agencies" & your relationship with your broker who assists you in manipulating stocks. now you will bless the court room guy with your amazing diligence & knock every one out of there seats! you will be served , as will janice (through the u.s. embassy), ulrich, mitchell & a host of others in a defamation/slander & libel suit. janice & jeffrey can amaze the attorneys with there 'professional research' while 'technical guy' ulrich "scans & procures" all your great documents supporting your cyber smear campaign of aznt. this will be my last post since i have provided information to the fbi investigation you penny stock bashers pathetically tryed to influence yesterday, i have provided the sec with over 500 pages of materials & have provided info to the aznt legal team. because of this there is very good chance my testimony will be used in court. now that we have WON & the default judgements were signed off by judge george , the stock cancelled & the freeze soon to be lifted there is no more reason to do battle with these fbna penny stock bashers. though these penny stock bashers were able to defend & promote andy mann here on si, there lawyers could not find anyway to defend his actions in a court of law. i only hope all small investors who use si understand the magnitude of what has happened here. this group attempted to hurt, halt & crush aznt on behalf of those who stold stock from the company & illegally shorted it. now these penny stock bashers are being served themselfs for the defamation & libel of aznt, its officers & its shareholders in there failed cyber smear campaign. to all the shareholders i say CONGRATULATIONS!! we have won this battle. jboxford, myerson & others may not survive what is about to happen but we, as shareholders, can now be proud to have exposed this fbna penny stock basher group for what they are. now the court will determine itself the extent of there damage to our investment , to the company & to us. i urge all shareholders to cease from posting as , like before, every post goes to the aznt legal team. congratulations my friends! we can all be very proud of what we as a group have accomplished & hopefully the hold groups such as this have on the otc has been lessened! AZNT SHAREHOLDERS ARE THE BEST!!!! spider Message 7320097 I note that all the e-mails have very detailed subject lines. For example: - TOD PAULEY ASKS IF ANYBODY HAS LINKED JANICES POSTS TO THE "WINDOW SHOOTING" - "radiator warehouse" more denial from kuglers right-hand man tod pauly(tonto) that Kugler visited AZNT - TOD PAULY (tonto) CARRIES ON ABOUT AZNT IS WORRIED "VISITOR WILL DESCRIBE THE BUILDING" The amount of time and effort Dobry must have put into all of this is astounding. And for what? It's also a total mystery to me what any of the e-mails have to do with Sylver's perjurious claim that Tod called him to and cursed him out. Yet Attorney Qualey allowed them to be included in the filing anyway. Why? Did he "owe" it to Pugs? Did he think the judge would be influenced against us by Pugs' ridiculous captions? Did he not even bother to read them? Read them but didn't care? Very very strange. - Jeff