Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (44984)	6/19/2000 9:36:00 AM
From: Rich1	Respond to of 93625

sounds like a plan.

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (44984)	6/19/2000 9:57:00 AM
From: cellhigh	Respond to of 93625

good luck...still holding and amazed

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (44984)	6/19/2000 10:01:00 AM
From: sam	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Zeev: I sure hope you bought back in at 80 or so. If anyone deserves this run, its you (and Stuart Steel).

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (44984)	6/19/2000 11:19:00 AM
From: gnuman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Zeev, More questions. There seem's to be a major change in direction here. Consider that major incentives were provided to those who supported RDRAM. (Apparently Intel's incentives were to design and sell chip sets that supported RDRAM). Yet now we find all main memory product is theoretically infringing and all chip sets create a revenue generating market. Why were all the potentially diluting stock warrants issued for RDRAM support if in fact SDRAM and DDRDRAM are to be more lucrative? And if someone were to get patent right's for producing supportive chip sets in sufficient volume, should this right be extended to others? JMHO's