SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Corel Corp. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: WBC who wrote (9379)6/19/2000 1:06:00 PM
From: Picanoc  Respond to of 9798
 
>His obsession seems to go beyond reason for a dissatisfied investor. By maligning the products at the "code" level, he is telling me that he is a disgruntled ex-employee, a competitor or a short....all of whom should have zero credibility on this thread.<

Or maybe someone who knows what he is talking about. The implication is that if you criticize Corel's development practices, you should have no credibility. You don't need to have access to Corel source code to know that they never fixed the leaking ship, they just bailed faster for a while. Why you dismiss the credibility of ex-employees is beyond me - virtually everybody involved with Corel is disgruntled - hence the rampant resignations.

The simple fact of the matter is that Corel is a software company which has never developed a professional methodology for software creation. You can believe that the problem is just poor marketing, but I think Corel has had some solid marketing efforts - but to deliver on them takes a level of execution the company has not displayed since 5 guys ordered a lot of pizza late at night for 6 months and produced CorelDraw.

The rot in this company goes deep - it will take several tiers of people who think there is more to good management than male bonding in cubicles. The open question is whether this enough time and money for this management overhaul to happen before the company collapses.

The tragedy here is that I think there is remaining value in many of the core products, even if, as Rod suggests, they need to be rebuilt from the ground up. It could have been done.



To: WBC who wrote (9379)6/19/2000 1:50:00 PM
From: Drew  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9798
 
Exactly. Rod carries on like an old lady at a tea party - constantly repeating himself and always negative.

Its one thing to state your opinion, which Rod has done quite thoroughly, but it is another to rehash and banter on about points stated on this thread many weeks ago.

I would agree that Rod is either a disgruntled ex-employee, a competitor, or a short.