Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mike devage who wrote (35663)	6/19/2000 12:19:00 PM
From: RidgeRunner	Respond to of 40688

mike devage & ZTECT, please stick around. Although your posts are not well received by all here, your probing questions are legitimate and should be answered by PNL management. The problem may simply be that Glenn needs to maintain a facade of everything is just fine while he tries to grow the company before the money runs out. THAT, to me, is the key issue: burn rate. Although PNL appears to have been good at controlling costs and stretching their cash, it all comes down to how much time they have left to establish adequate revenue to sustain operations before the well runs dry. We see the same problem across the dotcom spectrum of startups - funding drys up before the "next cool idea" has a chance to make money. PNL is no different than the others in that regard. So, investors should all be concerned about this most basic of issues: How much time is left on the PNL clock? It will determine whether our shares have a chance to appreciate significantly or become the subject of wistful "what might have been" family legend stories in the generations to come... RR