Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : CYBR CyberCare the new look of healthcare -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bear Down who wrote (2203)	6/19/2000 12:55:00 PM
From: makin_dough99	Respond to of 3392

Bear Down - he's been going to night school :)

To: Bear Down who wrote (2203)	6/19/2000 1:04:00 PM
From: sommovigo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3392

BearDown - David Evans looks dirty per the case against him. One must always ask QUI BONO - who benefits by the reporting of false and defamatory material? It has already been demonstrated that Evans did not report the truth - so your first assumption ("the reporters are reporting the truth") is incorrect. Now if we follow Herb Greenberg's predilection, which is to listen to short-sellers for the news, we discover the potential for reporters to be manipulated by undisclosed "sources". We already know that Herb Greenberg is not on the up-and-up because his "edited" reporting of the Martin Letter gave it a different twist... one that suited the bent of his bender. So Herb is not clean, but he is creative. Now - if Herb has been creative once, it suggests that Herb has been creative more than once. Is it a mere coincidence that Herb reported about an FDA inquiry into CYBR the very day that the FDA itself found out about their own informal inquiry? Is it meaningless that although Herb pounded on that subject quite a bit, the FDA found nothing wrong with CYBR's marketing practices? Is it unimportant to note that Herb's derogatory reporting caused the price of CYBR to fall, and the continued reporting helped it down into the 3's? I personally believe that Herb, either wittingly or unwittingly, as a potential puppet for some powerful and unclean short sellers, may have purposefully attempted to damage CYBR without justification - and potentially as prompted by someone outside the journal, which we have reason to believe was a short-seller (as per Herb's predilections). I was born in 1967, not last night. That anyone would assume criminal activity could not extend to reporters is naive. Happy Birthday.