Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JC Jaros who wrote (47007)	6/19/2000 3:56:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

>>Maybe that means the Supreme Court will jump right on it instead. -JCJ Slim chance of that with all those smoke signals. The natives are restless. They want to do justice to Jackson.

To: JC Jaros who wrote (47007)	6/19/2000 8:42:00 PM
From: TTOSBT	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

Re: "Maybe that means the Supreme Court will jump right on it instead." Is that what the Supreme Court's purpose should be -to jump right at the chance to bypass a panel of 7-10 appeal judges before they can exhaust defendant's claims of foul? Defendant's that have been found guilty by the judge who wants to sidestep them? This judge Jackson must have some influence in your opinion? Let's not forget the Supreme Court should give MSFT the same considerations that it would give you, I or any American who cried foul with mountains of documentation against the powerS of the United States government! After all they are SUPREME! TTOSBT