Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thunder who wrote (47016)	6/19/2000 5:37:00 PM
From: Thunder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

Also on Monday, a state judge in Nevada dismissed a class-action antitrust suit against Microsoft brought by consumers. The Nevada court cited the same law that an Oregon court used last week to dismiss a similar case. That law states that only those consumer who purchase a product directly from the company can sue to recover antitrust damages dailynews.yahoo.com Pretty soon they will be running on fumes.

To: Thunder who wrote (47016)	6/19/2000 5:45:00 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

.) Do you know the precise recess date(s) for the Supreme Court? No, I don't have that information, but wouldn't be interesting if Judge Jackson, by pure happenstance, does not issue his orders in time for the Supreme Court to be able to issue any sitting order until after the Supreme Court adjournment. This would, of course, delay the time the Supreme Court could rule on the Stay until after the 90 days has run. Due Process requires notice and an opportunity to be heard. I'm just guessing here, but I think that means sometime prior to the time when it would otherwise be meaningless. If this argument obtains with Judge Jackson then he will grant the stay pending Supreme Court redetermination of the stay issue. This would seem a fair thing to do, based on the issues that were before the court.