To: gizelle otero who wrote (6586 ) 6/20/2000 10:19:00 AM From: tayspop729 Respond to of 15615
Global Crossing Recoils From Equant Okay, gizelle otero, I'm not overly impressed with your article. It read to me like the author covered herself in every way possible...Global Crossing, which is especially strong in its undersea cable assets and U.S. fiber network, is building a global services network, partnering with and buying companies that help it fill out its coverage and products when necessary. For example, in a deal worth about $2.1 billion, the carrier just bought both Ixnet, which operates a global financial services network, and its parent company IPC Communications, which runs a desktop trading network for financial firms. Sounds like the Equant negotiations would have been a pretty good move.But under the surface, Global Crossing may be making haphazard moves to expand beyond its low-margin wholesale bandwidth business as soon as possible. "My concern with Global Crossing is that they?ve been doing a lot of buying and too little integrating," says Carl Garland, an analyst... Oops, maybe not.Its most recent pursuit, Equant, is well focused on a number of products, including video conferencing, secure local area networking connections and mainframe migration services. Owning Equant would catapult Global Crossing into higher-margin services markets. "They?d be buying into a more lucrative space," says Garland. Oh, wait a minute, perhaps it would be advantageous.But instead of paying a premium for Equant, Global Crossing must act carefully (like a dot-com) under recent market scrutiny. "Any suggestion that a company is being too aggressive at the expense of relatively near-term profitability is likely to be badly received," says James Governor, an analyst... So, they did good by not over-paying, huh?However, if Global Crossing sticks with its low-margin business of wholesaling bandwidth, the future looks cash poor. Uh oh, maybe they should have bumped up their price....but investors must wonder if Global Crossing, relentless in its pursuit to own a global network, is cruising for a bruising. So, being somewhat slow, I guess it was wrong for GBLX to drop their pursuit of Equant as the high-margin Equant provides is quite desirable. Or, they were wise to pass since Equant wanted too much of a premium. Or, Global Crossing may be in trouble in the long-run as they are going to be trapped in a low-margin future. Or, they did good by not being too aggressive at this point so they can carefully integrate their full-range of services and offerings. Sigh..... What do they say about most news articles or news releases? :) Regards, Scott