Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (116685)	6/20/2000 10:36:00 AM
From: that_crazy_doug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1584445

<< You continue to overlook the many different products coming out of those fabs when estimating CuMine wafer starts. I've answered this question so many times that I don't think one more time is going to change anything and I certainly can't publish yield reports here, assuming I had access to them.... >> If that's true, I think that would mean someone made a colossally stupid decision to let the core business suffer, and allocate that capacity to other areas.

To: Elmer who wrote (116685)	6/20/2000 12:35:00 PM
From: Petz	Respond to of 1584445

Elmer, re:<You continue to overlook the many different products coming out of those fabs when estimating CuMine wafer starts> Neither Dan nor myself did this. Intel has way more than six fabs, why can't they make all the non microprocessor stuff in these other fabs? In my estimates I even assumed that only 80% of Fab 12 was dedicated to CuMines. 85% of Intel's revenues comes from CPU's, if they can't dedicate at least 30,000 wpw to CPU production it illustrates a bigger problem than LOW YIELDS .... STUPIDITY. Petz