Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : CYBR CyberCare the new look of healthcare -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockDung who wrote (2301)	6/20/2000 12:54:00 PM
From: sommovigo	Respond to of 3392

Floyd - the stock was also down because of Herb's tirade - a tirade that the shorts knew of in advance, but no one else knew about it. There are shorts out there who have press connections and trade against foreknowledge of damaging articles, thanks to Herb's own loose lips... The stock trades where it tradesd and goes up and down for various reasons, but it remains that the company can tell an investor that a filing is immanent, just not what is contained in the filing. If the management doesn't meet the expectation they set for such a thing, then they have to answer to the shareholders - but that is the risk that they run. It is still not illegal for a company to advise an investor of an immanent filing that is expected, such as a 10k. Nor is it illegal for them to miss the mark they set - but, as I said before, if they do miss the mark - they have the shareholders to answer to for that.