SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (82200)6/20/2000 1:48:00 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
<<...and I still don't think equality and fairness are necessarily related.>> This is probably the only point that I agree with.

No one is equal in the material sense. In the political sense we are equal in regards to inalienable rights.

<<So for example testing to see if people are equally wealthy is EASY- you don't need to know any more about them than the value of their assets.>> Great example to illustrate that you are wrong. You and I could point to a brother and sister that seem to have similarly valued assets. Put the brother and sister together and you will hear nothing but squabling over inequities. We are not equal, we will never be equal, it is futile to seriously seek equity. There is only one practical use for an equity agenda. Use it to blackmail those who have material assets or positions that you covet. It is a fairly effective strategy although I personally detest it.



To: epicure who wrote (82200)6/20/2000 2:57:00 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I
still don't think equality and fairness are necessarily related.


Agree.

Absolute equality would require that men and women compete against each other in the 100 yard dash in the Olympics.

Equal. But not fair.