Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GENO who wrote (35710)	6/20/2000 2:21:00 PM
From: DocMalmbo.com	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 40688

just kiddin geno.... i am too old to fight, i am an antique! still great lookin though......lol! doc

To: GENO who wrote (35710)	6/20/2000 6:39:00 PM
From: ztect	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 40688

Boy you are silly........ When I felt the need to try to impress people with my picks, I use to keep record of them..... Message 7664852 Message 7704622 Now I don't care and feel no need. I post on one stock thread's probably as much for the community and entertainment value as for any financial commitment. Tsig's thread has been a real freak show esp. on RB with a former employee trying to get back at the CEO via the internet and use of multiple aliases.......... If the stock dropped to zero, I'd still be fine. But this thread gets to be plain silly. Do y'all think I'm bother one iota if you call me "anything". I just don't. Moreover, such slings and arrows make it more amusing for me to stick around. Rather than silly insults and talk of "agenda" maybe you should stick to the topic at hand. GZ by his own admission said PNL isn't in a "revenue phase" Prior to this based on the membership model Glenn was openly predicting "mass memberships" via contact with CCO's thus "overnight" revenues. Hence, he has scaled back his claims as the realities of how and how not to make money on the internet have come to pass. I've never written PNL "won't" succeed. I wrote that PNL needs a long run way. I'm concerned about a non-revenue phase being too extended espcially in light of the P2P article I posted from Business Week. Thus the concern for the PNL's ability to get financing on decent terms from an IB or VC's, rather than what may appear per message board gossip to be the selling of preferred shares that upon hitting a strike price could convert to a higher number of common shares and thus create greater dilution. I'm concerned that PNL has been unable to obtain financing from a IB. Geeze even poorly performing TSIG was able to obtain 125 mill in financing in the same market climate. There are other points regarding GZ's desire to expand w. Global Marketing that would significantly expand the burn rate, that could be argued both for and against on issues concerning branding and cost per set of obtained eyeballs, et cetera. But rather than get in a for or against discussion of point counterpoint, some of you krishnas, act as if I stole your carnations and am beating on your drums. Like I said, you can say whatever you want about me, it doesn't phase me, but IMO you'd be better off discussing PNLK .... Because y'all are just plain silly. z