Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gordon A. Langston who wrote (21072)	6/21/2000 11:23:00 AM
From: TigerPaw	Respond to of 769669

Court will correctly interpret the 2nd as individual An interesting interpretation will be "arms". I think it is clear that the court will not allow unrestricted access to nukes, They are also unlikely to allow unlicensed unrestricted access to full-automatic guns. So what will be the definition of arms which are inalienable? I think the current trend is to narrow that definition, perhaps eliminating handguns (without licensing similar to full-automatic). It all depends on the perception of violence and the proposed solutions. TP (It may be that Heston's muzzle loader will be the only weapon allowed)