Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Consolidated Silver Tusk Mines Ltd. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: andrew r harwood who wrote (2181)	6/21/2000 5:27:00 PM
From: James Harvey	Respond to of 2229

Andrew, I'm a lurker and appreciate your posts on CKS. I believe you are right about why the price hasn't moved lately. Add to what you've said that both ownership groups have put out overly optimistic (at best, lies at worst)reports and have gotten people's hopes up too often. The only thing that will move this stock is proof positive on the bottom line that they are actually selling gold and silver. Years of promises and no performance dull the soul and the market. Hope springs eternal, which is why I'm still in the stock, but hope loses some luster when performance fails so often. Jim Harvey

To: andrew r harwood who wrote (2181)	6/21/2000 11:21:00 PM
From: Wade	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2229

Hi Andy, I got a CKS news announcement as an e-mail attachment today. However, my MS word couldn't open it because it is an older version. Can any one post it at here? Sincerely, Wade

To: andrew r harwood who wrote (2181)	6/22/2000 4:31:00 PM
From: catzrsa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2229

I have to admit that I share your sentiment completely regarding the fickle nature of certain posters on this board. I would not have wanted the job that the new board has had to take on and for that matter I intend to remain patient, and give them the time to turn this thing around. Strange how there isn't any comment from those same posters on the latest news release. Is this because management seems to want to intend to preserve shareholder value after all, contrary to the "greed quest" that they are supposed to be on at the expense of shareholders, as these soothsayers have been predicting? I have been holding on to my stock, will continue to hold, and at this price, will buy more. I agree that there is not much down-side and until someone can give me actual evidence, other than "believe what you want, but something smells" then I will continue to hold and have faith. Good to hear that someone else remains loyal. Scott