SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: A.L. Reagan who wrote (12787)6/21/2000 6:13:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13582
 
Sabonas & Smitts ring a bell? lol.

< However, I have never heard IJ say that Q is
indifferent between making MC vs. DS ASIC's, or that the net royalty rate is the same.
Have you? >

I don't see why IJ has to address that issue yet, do you? He until recently spoke of DS and royalties.

Everything has a season..........



To: A.L. Reagan who wrote (12787)6/22/2000 1:01:00 AM
From: Valueman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13582
 
However, I have never heard IJ say that Q is indifferent between making MC vs. DS ASIC's, or that the net royalty rate is the same. Have you?

Broken record time. Net royalty rate is the same. There are 14 licensees signed for 3G, no matter what flavor. ERICY, for instance, pays the same rate, regardless. Q pays them nothing. Net rate is the same. Blah, blah, blah.....no matter how you doubt it, it stays the same....


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News