SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pgerassi who wrote (116980)6/21/2000 6:33:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Respond to of 1570559
 
Oh, I think it looks great for RMBS at least medium term, if they can pull off the patent scam. Money for nothing, as the old song went. And if all the memory makers, who they depend on to actually fabricate bs-ram, hate them even more for it, what does it matter? They hated Rambus plenty already, it seemed.

Now, where exactly this leaves Intel is the more interesting question for us. If the memory makers weren't falling over themselves to ramp things up for Willy before, it seems improbable for them to be more motivated now, but who can say?

Cheers, Dan.



To: pgerassi who wrote (116980)6/21/2000 7:30:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570559
 
Pete, <even RMBS is finally agreeing that their solution is good only for systems where the number of memory chips is no larger than 4>

Do you have a reference for this? And did you really mean memory chips or did you mean RIMMs (Rambus modules)?

Petz