SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: that_crazy_doug who wrote (117136)6/22/2000 10:55:00 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570913
 
Re: "You think buying stock/calls is riskier than writing naked puts? If the stock went down you'd have been in the hurt locker a lot worse than rest of us. Your strategy clearly cost you the least out of pocket money, but I certainly wouldn't call it a conservative route"

Why would I be any worse off than those who went long? If the stock went down those who bought calls would lose everything. That's not risky? My risk is limited. Do you foresee AMD going to zero? I don't. I didn't always feel this way but with a competitive product and worldwide demand I see AMD as a viable company for some time. If the stock goes down and I get assigned is that any worse off than those who bought shares? Why don't you call share buying risky? I'd be buying at a discount because of the premium I received. Your view of risk suggests you should be in a passbook savings account if you want to sleep at night.

EP



To: that_crazy_doug who wrote (117136)6/22/2000 11:04:00 AM
From: kash johal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570913
 
crazydoug,

re: selling naked puts vs buying stocks

Selling puts is inherently safer in event of a meltdown.

The "risk" is that your upside is limited by put price recieved.

regards,

Kash