SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Randy Ellingson who wrote (105243)6/23/2000 8:53:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 164684
 
I understand your points. I disagree that fulfillment is free in offline stores. But I also know
that you have direct experience on this point.


Randy,

You are giving me credit for experience I really do not have but thank you;-) If I placed my goods on a shelf for the customer to pick up and bring to the register, shrinkage would wipe me out in no time. I was making reference to mass merchandisers and department stores where items are brought to the cashier to be paid for by the customer. Book superstores fit that too.

Since it was going to be a gift, I felt I had to
correct the merchant's "error" (the book was apparently packaged in damaged form). Of
course the return involved time, and also involved some mis-information and uncertainty. Bad
luck, but almost certainly more likely from the low-cost vendor than from a demonstrated
customer service leader. All obvious, but I ended up buying the copy from Amazon.

So, yes, I do see the possibility that customers are willing to pay slightly more at the "right"
online store. Is it really necessary though, that the sale price be higher online than offline?


Your experience and your reasoning is what makes the successful retailer successful. I agree with you regarding the majority of consumers. The retailer needs to be adding value in terms of service. Otherwise, who need them? Amazon has that and we both agree. My long term concern is the inablility to sell higher margin products without anyayw for the customer to see, touch and feel. Amazon is already charging more for most items compared to their competitors. Not a lot more but just a little which is worth it for the better service.

I guess we agree. The missing issue is can this approach make decent bottom line profits in commodity products?

Glenn



To: Randy Ellingson who wrote (105243)6/23/2000 12:57:00 PM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Randy, all this negative noise about Amzn is taking my Aol down with it.:-(
>Worries about Amazon's profits going forward rocked the broader Internet sector, hitting even names like top Internet services provider America Online Inc. (AOL.N), said Joseph Barthel chief investment strategist at Fahnestock & Co.

``It just basically took over,'' he added.