SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tekboy who wrote (26697)6/23/2000 1:24:00 AM
From: Mihaela  Respond to of 54805
 
Tekboy,

--what is the ultimate size of the market for Rambus-royalty chips?

~38 billion in 2001

--what royalty rates is Rambus likely to get?

Just some estimates. The royalty rates of each company deal are confidential.

1% for SDRAM
1.5% for RDRAM
2% for DDR SDRAM
3%-5% for memory controllers

Mihaela



To: tekboy who wrote (26697)6/23/2000 2:49:00 PM
From: FLSTF97  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
RMBS

Although I think the recent capitulations by the Japanese DRAM manufacturers increases RMBS's claim to gorilla status, I still belong the Mike Buckley school in that I don't believe that "gorillas are never overvalued".

Let's take the year 2001 total DRAM market of $38 Bil at face value. I've seen royalty rate references ranging from 1-5% so let's take 3% as a median. That means 100% market share give RMBS revenues of S1.14 bil so with the current market cap of $11 bil it is about 10X sales. At that point who knows what OI they would have but let's project a pretax net margin of 90% which would give roughly $1 bil in pretax profit. I'll assume they have great accountants and only pay 32% taxes which gives final earnings of $680 mil. That means that an $11 bil investment(total market cap) returns 6.2%. This of course assumes no further growth in the memory market which is unfair. Traditionally this market has a CAGR of about 15% and I haven't seen any hockey stick projections (yet!) for future DRAM total market growth in $. Ignoring any time value adjustments that means in 2002 I'd get 7.8% and in 2003 I'd get 9%. The average of these is rather close to the current risk free interest rate one could expect. IMO too close. While I can't quite claim that RMBS is overvalued if one assumes it is risk free, I think you can argue that it is fully valued.

I think a reasonable person would question the assumption that RMBS is risk free. I do, but I've been told before that I am unreasonable!

FATBOY