SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Ashton Technology (ASTN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Libbyt who wrote (3529)6/23/2000 5:32:00 PM
From: Libbyt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4443
 
Another Street.com article....

thestreet.com



Market Features
The Wall Street Veteran Behind the Off-Market Block Trading Experiment
By Christopher H. Schmitt
Staff Reporter
6/23/00 4:37 PM ET
URL: thestreet.com

The deal between Ashton Technology Group(ASTN:Nasdaq) and the Philadelphia Stock Exchange to introduce off-market block trading for institutions had a
troubled start.

In 1996, the exchange's then-chairman failed to disclose to the exchange that he was an investor in Ashton at the same time he headed an exchange committee that
recommended a contract with Ashton. The disclosure triggered an exchange shake-up, and delayed the Philadelphia project for 18 months.

Ashton's chairman, Fredric Rittereiser, is a controversial figure as well. As the former head of Instinet, a pioneer in computerized trading,
Rittereiser drew the ire of Wall Street traditionalists by siphoning orders away from old-line firms. He also has advocated a so-called "central
limit order book" for collecting all stock market orders in one place, another plan that entrenched Wall Street interests have resisted.

He is a 37-year veteran of the securities industry, and among his many jobs, he was vice chair of First Jersey Securities Inc., where he
effectively ran the company from 1985 to 1987.

First Jersey, headed by the notorious Robert E. Brennan, was charged with allegedly manipulating the market for shares of small companies it underwrote. In 1996, a
federal appeals court upheld a $71 million fine against Brennan and First Jersey. Last year, Brennan settled a lawsuit brought by New Jersey authorities, by agreeing to
pay $45 million to investors. But the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and New Jersey state regulators say Brennan has consistently sought to hide his assets
overseas, leading to a contempt action in tangled legal proceedings that still continue more than a decade later.

Rittereiser blames the legal problems during his stewardship on Brennan, and says his job was to implement court orders to clean up the firm.

Running Wall Street firms runs in Rittereiser's family - his brother, Robert, is an industry veteran who is now chairman and chief executive of New York-based Gruntal
& Co.

Fredric Rittereiser became president and chief executive of Ashton in October 1996, after selling Instinet to Reuters. Ashton, founded in 1994, is a holding company that
today has four subsidiaries, including Gomez Advisors Inc., an e-commerce market research company best known for its online-brokerage ratings. It was another
Ashton subsidiary, Universal Trading Technologies Corp., that developed the Philadelphia exchange's eVWAP program.

A company Rittereiser owns, The Dover Group, has received about $460,000 in consulting payments from Ashton. He says the fees are payments in lieu of salary ("The
company can't pay me a million dollars a year") but adds that he soon may get a more traditional compensation contract with Ashton.

"I am a controversial guy in the sense I face some tough decisions," he says. "[I] tell it like it is, and therefore get this type of label."

¸ 2000 TheStreet.com, All Rights Reserved.



To: Libbyt who wrote (3529)6/25/2000 8:01:00 AM
From: Rob W  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4443
 
Interesting article. For the longest time, the critics here have argued that there is no interest in vwap trading, and in that article, they indicate that vwap trading is such a good deal that everybody will want it.

I wonder what the basis is for the statement indicating that time-slicing vwap accounts for 15% of the market and could rise to 20%. Hope it is true, as evwap offers substantial savings over time slicing.

When you timeslice, if you are a seller, wouldn't your VWAP mainly be composed of the average of all bid prices that were executed, and if a buyer, be composed of ask prices. Under eVWAP, the spread is effectively eliminated and those savings are passed back to the client. Plus, in those systems, your own trade should work against you.

Looks like next quarter we'll have much better information to judge whether ASTN is real deal or not.

Does anybody have any IPO pricing info on Gomez?

Cheers