Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Alcatel (ALA) and France -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: larry pollock who wrote (2047)	6/24/2000 3:44:00 PM
From: zbyslaw owczarczyk	Respond to of 3891

The the value of energy business IPO was quoted by analysts at the time it was announced ( May 4-5) based on value of U.S. group General Cable and Pirelli. THis is waht happen when one is following his investment,where other ids only complaining. nobody else had the problem with me quoting IPO possible value, but only you if you had followed the company more closely, you would known more. Remember when you accused me of lying that not Marconi but GE PLC bought Fore System. Of course it was beyond your knowledge and understanding that GE PLC has changed its name to Marconi(the name of GE PLC telecom unit). Then you have argued that officially it was GE not Marconi. You are so stubborn. As far as ALA management, I can assure you they are much smarter then you, and understood that it was my sarcastic response to you, when I said that I know CEO of Alcatel. Others on the thread quickly got message( look at the posts form others), but you ....... What is your contribution to this thread? Why others are not rising the same issue you did? Go and do something useful, bring some interesting article read some good analyst report, like I do ( Salomon Smith Barney) and post some notes on the thread. Is this so important if ALA will get 500 or 800 million from IPO. I was guessing like other analysts. What is important they will cash some good $, and the difference between what they get and what is expected is not going to change ALA price at all!!!!! Anybody disagree???????? Zbyslaw P.S. Does anybody else took my sarcastic response to Larry about talking to CEO of ALA on weekly basis so seriously like Larry? I anyone want to make comments about my or Larry posts, feel free to do so. I am tired to respond to Larry. Larry this is free country, and you can write what you want. I let other to comment about you posts if they decide to do so.

To: larry pollock who wrote (2047)	6/24/2000 4:21:00 PM
From: peeduka	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3891

Larry, I am struck by your vehemence and POV, which, it seems to me, can have several explanations: a) you are under 12 and don't get out much b) irony is a foreign to you c) your sense of humor has been severely dinged by some financial catastrophe d) you're dragging around a grudge that has nothing to do with the ALA board on SI d) you have a personality disorder and deserve sympathy e) you don't have much to say about ALA Could certainly be a combination of factors, too, but I can't say I'm eager to find out, whatever it is... -pv

To: larry pollock who wrote (2047)	6/24/2000 10:38:00 PM
From: Michael M	Respond to of 3891

Larry, all I ever hear you do (going back to NN thread)is complain about information that others post -- especially positive information. The great majority of what Zbyslaw brings are links to hard information. I appreciate that and I appreciate his opinions as well. He seems to understand the technology, the state of affairs in the industry and the prospects of ALA. That's all positive in my book. I don't know what causes you to act like suck a jerk (starting with the ALL CAPS name) but I wish you would go away and stay away. I'd hate to catch whatever ails you. Good luck. Mike