SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Interdigital Communication(IDCC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: w molloy who wrote (4341)6/24/2000 7:56:00 PM
From: Bulls  Respond to of 5195
 
You are such a child.

1. "Nok_QCOM deal would leave IDCC in the cold."
Oh really? Why? Would IDCC's IPR magically disappear? LMAO
Anything NOK does to solidify it's total 3g package is OK with me.
2. "If not, You must have your head rammed very far up your ass to have ridden IDC down from its $82 high to it's present levels."
LMAO. You avoid the 284% gain. LOL And where have you ridden QCOM from genius?
Go back to kindergarten. Was that the late bell I just heard? Hurry molley.



To: w molloy who wrote (4341)6/24/2000 8:33:00 PM
From: postyle  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5195
 
The only way you could have actualy made around 280% was by buying a boat load of IDC June puts back in February, as I recommended to Gus and the thread... You must have your head rammed very far up your ass to have ridden IDC down from its $82 high to it's present levels

w molloy, are you here to just to gloat or also to take pot shots at IDCC investors?

I think it would best serve all of us if we eliminated the childish behavior. You might not think IDCC is a good investment presently, but then again, you also didn't think Nokia was a GSM licensee of the company.

By the way, since those of us who bought IDCC around $5 are "are up a big fat 0!"...

wouldn't those IDCC investors who didn't sell around $80, and subsequently must have had their heads rammed very far up their asses, really also only be down a big fat zero?

At least according to your logic...

good day,

postyle