SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Computerized Thermal Imaging CIO (formerly COII) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chirodoc who wrote (4247)6/24/2000 8:29:00 PM
From: A.L. Reagan  Respond to of 6039
 
Thanks Doc!

Keep 'em buying (preferably in margin accounts). Looking for a Monday entry if the Pluvians haven't already swiped all the shares.

Hope COII does get its national market listing. Helps the liquidity a whole bunch - lots more float - less risk of manipulation either short or long.

I'm all for open markets, and full disclosure.

But Doc, you haven't answered my previous question. Only takes a simple yes or no. C'mon, go on the record.



To: chirodoc who wrote (4247)6/24/2000 9:21:00 PM
From: Mama Bear  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6039
 
"20M short shares x a rise of 12x's in stock price (.70 - $9) has created a loss of approximately $240M!!!!!! "

Two bad assumptions, and a significant math error.

First bad assumption: That you have a clue as to what the short interest is. Since it is not reported on OTC stocks, you are making this number up.

Second bad assumption: That every single share of the made up short interest was done at the low. One could as easily and as erroneously assume that all were shorted at the high, and has resulted in a profit of $220 million (using your made up number). BTW, the stock hasn't been as low as 0.70 since August of '99.

Math error: 20 million times 8.30 (9 - 0.70) = $166 million, not $240 million. When you make up fiction, you could at least do the math correctly.

Regards,

Barb



To: chirodoc who wrote (4247)6/25/2000 12:32:00 AM
From: A.L. Reagan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6039
 
Curtis, are you directly or indirectly related (by means of either ownership or on account of receiving compensation from) to any person or entity listed as a selling shareholder on the 6/20/00 Rule 144 stock registration statement?

You want to know, why are they doing this now, at this time?
(Since the deal looks like it's been cheese for years.)

See first paragraph.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News