To: seed_partner who wrote (647 ) 6/25/2000 10:36:00 AM From: LLCF Respond to of 436258
<Logic? is 20 up trading days on the NAZ mythical? Maybe I hear the the radio wrong on the the way to work.> Don't have any idea what you're talking about...listening to WPLY in the a.m.? I do know your post was in error. Please do your homework, it's not fair to those taking the time to respond to also have to backtrack and figure out what you're talking about. <"proper portfolios here on SI updated daily" <Aren't you a Pro?> Yes, whatever that is. <Can you steer me to any info on "Kincaid Trading"> Nope, private. Do you have a prospectus? Nope, private. I can't even find a Yellow Page listing. Nope, private Maybe that is just a joke? Nope Maybe the Company is defunct? Nope Do you tell your clients to look at your portfolio on SI?> Sorry, it's a private hedgefund with private money, mostly mine... I am not looking for clients and don't really care about documentation here on SI, but then I don't run around making claims either. I am one of the few people on SI using my real name, profile etc... you can probably do all sorts of checking up on me if you really care, not many others can say that. As I have stated, I was heavily involved in biotech when it was 'value' [which I am now rolling into gold stocks] and run a portfolio over there... but this is less than one year, not representative of long term performance:siliconinvestor.com All trades are documented on the T/TIF threads if you care. Better to watch the real pro's who I get all my picks biotech picks from on this thread:Subject 14492 This is an example of a documented portfolio right here on SI that shows true returns being produced. <Jeez you guys are defensive.> Us? Ho ho...you're the attack dog with no teeth! We really don't need chatty little know nothings that bring so little to the table, we all have our opinions over here and share them feely, you are also urged to share your opinion or go away. Quite frankly you've been nothing but a waste of my time so far, and we don't need that. DAK