SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Webvan Group (WBVN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rajiv who wrote (195)6/26/2000 9:18:00 AM
From: egggmann  Respond to of 464
 
Looks good. Webvan is getting more DC's and eliminating a direct competitor with little overlap.

The two companies had basically the same business model building out across the country at the same time but WBVN has a better cash position and higher market cap so it is "bailing out" HOMG by using stock as currency.

I like it. WBVN is using about 1/3 of it's stock to buy HOMG which has about 1/3 of the mkt cap of WBVN so there's not much of a premium involved. (not huge anyway) It removes a direct competitor which if you think about it is great. I was worried about HOMG coming into Atlanta because I saw no real way for WBVN to differentiate itself. Not anymore.

One interesting question however is just how close HOMG was to opening in Atlanta. If they already sunk a lot of money into an almost opened DC in Atlanta, then what will WBVN do with it?? WBVN says that they only use one DC per urban area for cost savings, by buying HOMG they may be buying a redundant DC in Atlanta. Any thoughts?



To: Rajiv who wrote (195)6/27/2000 11:49:00 AM
From: Rajiv  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 464
 
Last week Anthony Noto of Goldman Sachs pumped WBVN causing a substantial pop in WBVN's stock price. This week WBVN announces the takeover offer for HOMG.

Here is the interesting part - Goldman Sachs advised WBVN on this takeover.

It is generally understood that when you are advising a firm on a potential M&A deal, you are not supposed to make any comments on the relevant firm. Anthony Noto clearly violated this rule.

Regards,
Rajiv