Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Goutam who wrote (117640)	6/26/2000 10:37:00 AM
From: Goutam	Respond to of 1577993

Ooops .... I forgot to provide the link to the post I was referring to in my previous post --- Message 11861688

To: Goutam who wrote (117640)	6/26/2000 10:50:00 AM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577993

Goutama, I welcome contrary stuff, but there are some who seem to scour every publication on earth to find the dirty stuff (or the good stuff, depending on their agenda). I try to be open minded, do admit that I fail sometimes. That one you cited is pretty old, as I recall. What, did you bookmark it? :-) Tony

To: Goutam who wrote (117640)	6/26/2000 1:57:00 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577993

I welcome your thinking that contra thinking would be valuable to this thread. Don't you think it's also better to have contra thinking on all the threads? Here is a post by you that I found on some other thread - ___________________________________________________________________ Charles, > Yes! This is the IMS case. Intel played dirty to win that case by using a very devious technique. Give us a break Charles. You come out of the woodwork whenever their's any (potentially) dirty laundry about Intel. I can tell by the "Yes!" that you're getting all excited about this one. Ambulance chaser. Goutama You are good! ted