Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ggamer who wrote (13287)	6/26/2000 3:44:00 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13582

Which of the objects was damaged the least, the phone or the Japanese car? Very funny! Assuming the trials go well, and Nokia and M1 [Mission Impossible?] are able to begin commercialization, wouldn't the next issue on the table be the extent of the Q's IPR rights in DS CDMA? In this sense, i.e., that it might hasten negotiations about IPR, the Singapore network is probably a good thing.

To: ggamer who wrote (13287)	6/26/2000 3:49:00 PM
From: Keith Feral	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13582

These auctions in Britain and Germany obliterate any chance that European operators will not be deploying 3G CDMA based UMTS wireless networks in the near future. Does anyone think that VOD would buy a license, sell off assets in Orange to pay for the spectrum, and then put the spectrum aside until 2007? I can't imagine why this guy Snyder is dragging the price of the Q through the mud. The only analyst I have ever witnessed make such absurd charges against QCOM was Marc Cabi. He was involved in the ERICY QCOM agreement representing ERICY. I wonder if Snyder is representing NOK in some way.