Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (105525)	6/27/2000 7:30:00 AM
From: re3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

<<<when was the last time nasdaq had a pe of 25?? exactly. i assume you figure it should be higher because of growth. technology may be here forever but new companies not in the nas currently may turn out to be the winners and the current nas companies (or some of them) may turn out to be dinosaurs. why pay a pe of 25 for a company when the future growth of that industry might be captured elsewhere ?

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (105525)	6/27/2000 10:25:00 AM
From: Olu Emuleomo	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 164684

>>>Why is pe 25 "fair"? ike when was the last time nasdaq had a pe of 25?? Victor, Until Ikegodsey tells me he has SHORTED QQQ, I wont take him seriously. He believes Nasdaq should be @ 625. Why doesnt he short QQQ right now? If he is right, that's a hell of a profit! However, I believe he is just mouthing off! I am long QQQ and I bet Sarmad that we wont see Nasdaq 3000 (on a closing basis) before Oct 1. Oct and Nov can be funny. After Nov, we may never see Nasdaq 3000 again! BTW, all you bears should note that we havent seen Nasdaq 3000 at all this year!!! --Olu E.