SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: re3 who wrote (105561)6/27/2000 8:14:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 164684
 
Quantitative Strategy Update
Morning Call Notes (Bulletin Available)
 ) High Quality Stocks Inexpensive Even When Using P/E-to-Growth
 Our theme for the past month or so has been that the Technology bubble has left true
high quality stocks historically inexpensive based on P/E and P/CF. Some have
suggested that our analysis does not account for the growth opportunities that exist
within lower quality (i.e., Technology) stocks. After all, the average five-year projected
earnings growth rate for the companies in our B- Index is 17.0%, while the same figure
for our A+ Index is only 13.8%.
 In response, we have written a short report that examines the current P/E-to-Growth Rate
of each of our Quality Indices (i.e., A+, A, A-, B+, B, and B-; the data are not really
meaningful for our C&D Index). These indices currently comprise more than 1300
companies.
 Currently, our B- Index sells at 5.1 times its projected five-year earnings growth rate, and
our B Index sells at 2.9 times. For comparison, our A+ Index sells at 1.8 times its five-year
growth rate. (see chart below)
 Thus, even when accounting for prospective growth opportunities, true high quality
companies appear inexpensive when compared to lower quality ones.
(R. Bernstein)
Bulletin
United States
27 June 2000
Morning Notes Summary
Part 2
Merrill Lynch & Co.
Global Securities Research & Economics Group
Global Fundamental Equity Research Department
RC#11217912



To: re3 who wrote (105561)6/28/2000 11:15:00 AM
From: Jan Crawley  Respond to of 164684
 
what's your target on the mighty Q ?

Hi Ike, I think that Qcom will be back to $100 during 12/00 and 01/01; so it will be ok FOR ME to hold a position of 500 shares.