Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yousef who wrote (118313)	6/29/2000 1:59:00 PM
From: dougSF30	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578012

This anti-copper argument is so tired. (1) Haven't we heard 10 times over that the biggest reason for going to copper at .18u is to gain experience about that process, making the shrink to .13u that much less complicated? (As opposed to Intel's all-in-one conversion plans.) (2) I expect the copper Athlons do have more headroom than their Austin counterparts, and you may well see 1100 MHz chips soon-- whether these will be exclusively copper remains to be seen. But the major point here is: There's little motivation for AMD to ship chips clocked fast enough to reveal any benefits of copper at .18u as long as Intel can't ship anything over 866 MHz in volume. Oh, and Paul, Re: AthWipers -- tell us again how you're long AMD (!) I could use a little humor today. Doug