Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lawdog who wrote (22160)	6/29/2000 2:34:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Yes, stupid. That's what the debate is about. Was Clinton acting in his capacity as President when he criminally perjured himself in the Jones case and for other criminal actions he may have committed while sitting as President. Clear now lawdope? I suspect if it was crystal clear that the capacity argument could be disposed of summarily, Clinton would already have been indicted. Moreover, I'm sure that Starr, unlike the scumbag in the WH who cares for nothing and no one but himself, was concerned with the long term effect of an indictment on the office and the nation. JLA