Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Computerized Thermal Imaging CIO (formerly COII) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chirodoc who wrote (4767)	6/30/2000 11:15:10 PM
From: Bear Down	Respond to of 6039

COII will not get listed on Nasdaq with fraudsters like Johnston involved. That you can take to the bank

To: chirodoc who wrote (4767)	6/30/2000 11:34:47 PM
From: StockDung	Respond to of 6039

Dog LOSER, get over the bitterness as I have suggested, it will consume you throughout the few remaining years of your old age. You have been PUMPED, DUMPED and HUMPED as a COII CHUMP. It is unfortunate that you had to lose so badly, but not all was lost, your incredibly stupid investment choices serve as a shining example to others to not be such dorky dolts. Watch out Newbies, these CHUMPS are just trying to get more suckers into the stock to BAIL them out of their MASSIVE LOSSES!! Waiting for the Judgment day!! TheTruthseeker

To: chirodoc who wrote (4767)	6/30/2000 11:56:31 PM
From: Prospector	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6039

Ya never know Chiro this could get interesting...LOL Prospector..

To: chirodoc who wrote (4767)	7/1/2000 12:01:20 AM
From: StockDung	Respond to of 6039

*********REMEMBER E-CONNECT************ U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 42522 / March 13, 2000 The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), of over-the-counter trading of the securities of eConnect, of San Pedro, California at 9:30 a.m. EST on March 13, 2000, and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EST on March 24, 2000. The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of eConnect because of questions that have been raised about the adequacy and accuracy of publicly disseminated information concerning, among other things, a purported license arrangement regarding PalmTM organizers, a purported strategic alliance with a brokerage firm to distribute one of eConnect's products, and the amount of revenue reportedly generated by one of eConnect's websites. The Commission cautions broker-dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that they should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available information and any information subsequently issued by eConnect. Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 under the Exchange Act, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered unless and until they have strictly complied with all of the provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer has any questions as to whether or not he has complied with the rule, he should not enter any quotation but immediately contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by Rule 15c2-11, he should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of eConnect until such time as he has familiarized himself with the rule and is certain that all of its provisions have been met. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation for the stock of eConnect that is in violation of the rule, the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. If any broker-dealer or other person has any information that may relate to this matter, call the Pacific Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission at (323) 965-3998. sec.gov Last update: 03/13/2000

To: chirodoc who wrote (4767)	7/1/2000 12:52:45 PM
From: Bear Down	Respond to of 6039

Any comments tout boy?? By: shortreport Reply To: 30275 by nigebirch $$$$ Saturday, 1 Jul 2000 at 12:46 PM EDT Post # of 30278 Let's see what type of character Curtis Turchin, chirodoc, is. Let's see he gets sued multiple times and has had various tax liens placed against him as recent as 1998 Good moral character? I think not TURCHIN CURTIS appears as a defendant in a suit filed on 04-12-1993 in SANTA CLARA County, CA. First plaintiff is FROST LINDA. Suit type is PERSONAL INJURY. TURCHIN CURTIS appears as a defendant in a suit filed on 01-12-1990 in SANTA CLARA County, CA. First plaintiff is MARKOWITZ ROBERT. Suit type is MALPRACTICE - MEDICAL. TURCHIN DC CURTIS appears as a plaintiff in a suit filed on 06-25-1987 in SANTA CLARA County, CA. First defendent is MORGAN LOIS GAY. Suit type is MONEY. TURCHIN, CURTIS V. appears as a defendant in a suit filed on 04-20-1994 in SANTA CLARA County, CA. First plaintiff is MANNERS, PATTI. Suit type is PERSONAL INJURY. CURTIS TURCHIN appears as a debtor in a COUNTY TAX LIEN RELEASE lien filed on 11-06-1998 in SANTA CLARA county, CA. First lien holder is COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. CURTIS TURCHIN appears as a debtor in a TAX lien filed on 02-27-1998 in CA. First lien holder is EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTM. CURTIS TURCHIN DC appears as a debtor in a TAX lien filed on 03-13-1998 in SANTA CLARA county, CA. First lien holder is EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTM. TURCHIN CURTIS appears as a debtor in a COUNTY TAX LIEN lien filed on 11-06-1998 in SANTA CLARA county, CA. First lien holder is COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. TURCHIN CURTIS appears as a debtor in a STATE TAX LIEN lien filed on 03-13-1998 in SANTA CLARA county, CA. First lien holder is STATE OF CALIFORNIA. TURCHIN CURTIS appears as a debtor in a STATE TAX LIEN RELEASE lien filed on 03-13-1998 in SANTA CLARA county, CA. First lien holder is STATE OF CALIFORNIA. TURCHIN CURTIS appears as a debtor in a TAX lien filed on 11-06-1998 in SANTA CLARA county, CA. First lien holder is TAX COLLECTOR.

To: chirodoc who wrote (4767)	7/1/2000 1:50:22 PM
From: chirodoc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6039

*WHAT POSTS ARE ILLEGAL OR UNETHICAL?* the law states that the same rules that are applied to written words apply to the online world. slander, defamation of character, and manipulating a stock price for profit are all actionable. HERE IS A GREAT RESOURCE TO HELP YOU: enforcenet.com

To: chirodoc who wrote (4767)	7/1/2000 2:27:34 PM
From: Bear Down	Respond to of 6039

You just keep avoiding all relevant information and questions Any comments tout boy?? By: shortreport Reply To: 30275 by nigebirch $$$$ Saturday, 1 Jul 2000 at 12:46 PM EDT Post # of 30278 Let's see what type of character Curtis Turchin, chirodoc, is. Let's see he gets sued multiple times and has had various tax liens placed against him as recent as 1998 Good moral character? I think not TURCHIN CURTIS appears as a defendant in a suit filed on 04-12-1993 in SANTA CLARA County, CA. First plaintiff is FROST LINDA. Suit type is PERSONAL INJURY. TURCHIN CURTIS appears as a defendant in a suit filed on 01-12-1990 in SANTA CLARA County, CA. First plaintiff is MARKOWITZ ROBERT. Suit type is MALPRACTICE - MEDICAL. TURCHIN DC CURTIS appears as a plaintiff in a suit filed on 06-25-1987 in SANTA CLARA County, CA. First defendent is MORGAN LOIS GAY. Suit type is MONEY. TURCHIN, CURTIS V. appears as a defendant in a suit filed on 04-20-1994 in SANTA CLARA County, CA. First plaintiff is MANNERS, PATTI. Suit type is PERSONAL INJURY. CURTIS TURCHIN appears as a debtor in a COUNTY TAX LIEN RELEASE lien filed on 11-06-1998 in SANTA CLARA county, CA. First lien holder is COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. CURTIS TURCHIN appears as a debtor in a TAX lien filed on 02-27-1998 in CA. First lien holder is EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTM. CURTIS TURCHIN DC appears as a debtor in a TAX lien filed on 03-13-1998 in SANTA CLARA county, CA. First lien holder is EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTM. TURCHIN CURTIS appears as a debtor in a COUNTY TAX LIEN lien filed on 11-06-1998 in SANTA CLARA county, CA. First lien holder is COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. TURCHIN CURTIS appears as a debtor in a STATE TAX LIEN lien filed on 03-13-1998 in SANTA CLARA county, CA. First lien holder is STATE OF CALIFORNIA. TURCHIN CURTIS appears as a debtor in a STATE TAX LIEN RELEASE lien filed on 03-13-1998 in SANTA CLARA county, CA. First lien holder is STATE OF CALIFORNIA. TURCHIN CURTIS appears as a debtor in a TAX lien filed on 11-06-1998 in SANTA CLARA county, CA. First lien holder is TAX COLLECTOR.

To: chirodoc who wrote (4767)	7/1/2000 2:28:51 PM
From: Boddington	Respond to of 6039

Chirodoc, lying tout. Maybe some of what I write has been already addressed, but I was so enraged by your total lies that I had to at least write this. #1. Nazis had nothing to do with Pearl Harbour. #2. Becoming "fully reporting" as a BB stock has nothing to do with having "evrything about the business and the directors' past carefully scrutinized." #3 You are an evil lying sack of fraud that I pray will be exposed. To hold any stock from $0.70 to $20 is just plain stupid and irresponsible, and to claim that you're nothing but an honest investor is insulting to anyone with any intelligence. You likely did pay $0.70 for your shares, but I'll bet you did it when the stock was trading for $10.00 #4. Liar, fraud, tout, and cheater of decent people you will be exposed.

To: chirodoc who wrote (4767)	7/1/2000 2:44:36 PM
From: Pluvia	Respond to of 6039

THERMAL SCAN TECHNOLOGY IS A FAILURE For COII to be commercially successful, their equipment must prove to be a replacement for either mammography or a biopsy – or both. If the COII equipment cannot prove to be better then these existing tests, radiologists state nobody will ever buy the equipment, as it would serve no purpose. This is a logical conclusion. COII’S PAID RESEARCHERS ADMIT COII’S EQUIPMENT IS NOT BETTER THAN MAMOGRAPPHY, AND WORLD RESPECTED MAMOGRAPHY EXPERT DR. SICLES STATES COII’s OWN RESEARCH PROVE THERMAL SCANS WILL NEVER REPLACE BIOPSIES… Q: SO - who is going to buy COII’s equipment? A: Nobody… COII is in the business of selling investors stock using the "cancer detection breakthrough" story. They do this to makes themselves, (COII insiders and promoters), rich via stock sales. COII is not in the business of selling equipment - only stock… ************************** Yuri Parisky, an associate professor of radiology at the USC/Norris Cancer Center in Los Angeles, is directing a company- sponsored clinical test of the breast cancer scanning system at USC. He's concerned some investors are over-hyping the scanning system. Parisky said he began reading messages about the company on Ragingbull.com after fielding numerous investor calls. ``People are touting this as a replacement for mammography, which it's not,'' he said. Parisky, who also is paid $1,000 a day by the company for periodic consulting services. He said the system may spare patients the need to undergo a biopsy for breast cancer by analyzing heat patterns in the body. Preliminary tests show a 96 percent cancer detection rate for its system, according to an article he published in 1998. That's not good enough, according to Edward Sickles, professor of radiology at the University of California at San Francisco. Biopsies are 99 percent accurate, he said. ``It's an experimental technology,'' said Sickles, referring to Computerized Thermal's system. ``It probably doesn't work.''** Doctors won't substitute a new technique unless they're confident about its accuracy, according to Sickles. Using a less reliable, although less invasive technique -- like a thermal scan -- could be fatal if it fails to detect a cancer. quote.bloomberg.com All comments are the EXPRESS opinion of the Author(s) – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.