Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric L who wrote (27169)	7/2/2000 9:07:41 AM
From: 100cfm	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54805

Eric Thanks for thtat very informative repnse. Didn't Dr J himself say that WCDMA will not have the same capabilitites and will not be as efficien as MCCDMA. I believe he was very clear about this during the Unicom squabble. Also is it not true that WCDMA will require a huge amount of antenaes/base stations thus making it more expensive to build out. Legal battles are in regard to Q's expected road block until it gets it's slice of the pie for it's essential IP which at this time the major players are refusing to recognize. Was unaware that cdma2000 was not standerdized. Actually it's a bit of a shock. Your post has been the first I have read to be at all WCDMA positive, I guess I was jaded from reading every Post being negative WCDMA as being inferior, less efficient, more expensive. Would love to dissect WCDMA further. 100