Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NY Stew who wrote (27185)	7/2/2000 9:46:30 AM
From: Uncle Frank	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 54805

>> A big caveat here is that in Physics I made a Bong out of some of my lab equipment. <ROFLMAO!!!> Has this in any way affected your analytical capabilities with regards to gmst <lol>? cuf

To: NY Stew who wrote (27185)	7/2/2000 10:54:38 AM
From: gdichaz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54805

NY Stew: Thanks. The explanation is clear, so you get kudos as a teacher, even if some experiments went Bong years ago. On an entirely different subject, if, repeat it, the Gemstar merger is blocked by the US Gov't, my memory is that you have said that would not be too bad, in fact given the arrangements already in place between the two companies might even be good for Gemstar. Do I remember that right? The reason I ask is that looking at the recent US Gov't actions on MSFT and WCOM, a rejection of the GMST merger seems in the cards. No way to know of course, but isn't it more realistic to assume no merger, or difficult conditions at a minimum, than a simple green light? Again, thanks for the clarification on SNDK's MLC. Best. Cha2