To: Cacaito who wrote (13942 ) 7/3/2000 11:51:26 PM From: Robert K. Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 17367 My, my, are we ever off base here.....I just dont believe these conversations. I have so many points to counter I dont know where to begin. I will just touch a few. Cacaito>ever here of RK (no- not me)? How about lasik? What do they administer for lasik? What are they testing bpi with? Small market? How many rx's a year? Whats the incidence of opthalmic resistance in europe? I Agree with Blue, you are blindsided or one-sided. Now you attack bax or any associated with x. Whatever. Yes I agree with the obvious. Trauma halted. Meningo unpublished and more data requested. You can believe bpi is worthless all you want. Too me thats very shortsighted for a smartie like you. Geez. bpi working inside of you as I type, protecting you, but still you discount its actions. Let me ask you this cacaito. this is a real question and I expect a answer. If someone offered you say $100,000 dollars to have all of your natural bpi permanently removed would you do it? Again is your own bpi worth $100,000 to you. Answer please. George> you are listening to someone medically smarter than you and getting a wee bit confused. BPI is a natural substance that protects you. Multiple actions. Please dont knit pick what actions you think work. They all do. Question is what actions can best be applied by bax & x. and how to prove it. Blue. Shame on you. You herald antibiotic actions. No doubt a noble cause. I hold high hopes also for its application. But please, why discount all other bpi actions? Are they worthless? There is no viable anti-endotoxin on the market today. Can we use one? There are 30plus anti-angiogenics in testing does that mean bpi has no use there even with a dual action (or more)? Oh please, can the world stand another fungicidal,(CIDAL), and that doesnt even take into account safety profiles. Ever hear of lifetime dose limits? Mycobacteria, inclusion antibodies, i can go on and on. And while I am at it for every tongue lashing statement I just gave to you blue>is also meant for that cacatio for he is either 1. too irresponsible to ignore ignore what I said or 2. too stupid. > And I know he aint stupid. Now you all on SI and yahoo and the club can piss ante around all these issues but facts are facts and facts are that bpi has multiple novel actions that are agressively being investigated. I look forward to bax and allergan and a future partner to make it happen. Only a matter of time. And thats just the bpi story. Gods only knows how good anti-cd11a will be as a immunosuppresive. And my goodness ING-1 using the bodys own system to attempt to defeat cancer. Brilliant idea. I cant wait and I can wait. I expect a response to my question c. And I want blue to answer it too for posterity. I want to see just how smart you both are. All IMO, standard k's abound. No, I am not angry or agitated, more astounded at you all.