SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (82132)7/4/2000 2:57:24 AM
From: S. maltophilia  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
MB
re VERT writes
1. You're right--I don't know what year this is.-g-
2. No argument there.
3. If it goes to 100, you make more, but it takes longer to realize it (we're both thinking IRA--l/t tax rates don't matter here).
4. If the premium shrinks after my first expiration, I would consider closing the long and freeing up the capital-- plenty of other stocks out there. As to the stock possibly being lower, the risk is always there. The question is how much risk over how long a period of time. Stock selection always comes first.
5. In a takeover, we'll both regret how much we left on the table-g-, but that's the price of getting all that cash up front. I've had several buy/writes taken out that way, but they were all deep value situations. A small risk in this scenario.-g-

So far this year, my most consistent buy/write has been ABX. NO upside, not much downside risk. Plenty of emotional folks bidding up the calls, so the near month is good for 4-5%.(In 1996 MUfit that bill-wouldn't touch it with aten foot pole since). I also limit risk by trading a lot of small positions rather then a few big ones so mistakes don't cost too much. But they're all trading sardines; I don't want them to stay in the can long enough to get too rancid.-g-



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (82132)7/4/2000 6:38:48 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 132070
 
To All, Happy Firecracker.