SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Conseco Insurance (CNO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (1559)7/4/2000 2:40:39 PM
From: Tunica Albuginea  Respond to of 4155
 
The Seattle Times , Dec. 5, 1997 Executive's wife awarded half of all assets ,

also known in some circles as

" getting the shaft ",


TA

seattletimes.nwsource.com

Executive's wife awarded half of all assets

by Sharon Walsh and Devon Spurgeon
Washington Post

STAMFORD, Conn. - In a closely watched divorce case, a
Connecticut judge said loud and clear that the wife of a
wealthy corporate executive should get half of the assets
accumulated during the marriage - whether or not she worked
outside the home.


GE Capital Services Chairman Gary Wendt and his high-school
sweetheart and wife of the past 32 years, Lorna Jorgenson
Wendt, were dividing a marital estate worth as much as $100
million.

It was not just the amount of money and property involved
that made the case unique - there have been other divorces
involving more money.

But this divorce became the central exhibit in the debate over both legal
and social questions: What is a wife worth? What is the value of her contribution to the
marriage, especially if she does not work outside the home?



"It's very clear . . . this judge said by the way he
divided the assets, `I view this as a full partnership,' "

said Sanford Ain, a prominent Washington divorce
lawyer. "It's a very important statement."

Connecticut, like the majority of states, is known as
an "equitable-distribution" state in divorce cases, giving
judges wide latitude on what they award.

Even in the half-dozen or so states that have community-
property laws, the property is not always divided equally,
though Lorna Wendt would have had a better shot at half in those states.

"Enough is enough"

"There's been a discussion among lawyers in recent years
that judges tend to award the economically dependent spouse
of a very wealthy couple a small percentage of the total
assets," said Ain.

The concept is known as the "enough-is-enough" standard
because judges think a spouse, usually the woman, who is
getting millions in a divorce settlement has more than
enough to maintain her lifestyle, so why should she get
half?

"Judges in other states will look at this closely," he
said.

Gary Wendt had argued that he did offer his ex-wife half of
his estate, although he did not include the value of
certain future compensation because he would not collect
the cash until after his divorce.


Often, the bulk of the multimillion-dollar pay packages
awarded to top executives these days are in the form of
such deferred compensation.

Lorna Wendt rejected an offer of an $11 million
settlement early on, and said she did not take her now
ex-husband to court for money but for the principle.


"I stood up and said, `I've been in this marriage for 32
years. This isn't fair,' " she said.

A representative for Gary Wendt said he was in a helicopter
en route to deliver a speech to a business group in New
Jersey when Judge Kevin Tierney handed down his 465-page
decision Wednesday.

In a prepared statement, Gary Wendt said he intended to
examine the verdict closely before making any public
statement.

"The principal issue in this case was not the relative
contribution of the non-working spouse vs. the working
spouse, but rather the division of future earnings after
the non-working spouse has been generously rewarded," his
statement said.

Lorna Wendt did not get everything she asked for. She will
get a multimillion-dollar house in Stamford and a house in
Key Largo, Fla.; $252,000 a year, payable in equal monthly
installments of $21,000; half of all stocks, bonds, cash
and mutual funds in 19 accounts; and memberships in the
Ocean Reef Club in Key Largo and the Stanwich Club in
Greenwich.

Sought stocks, bonuses

But, in addition to half of everything accumulated by the
Wendts during their marriage, Lorna Wendt wanted half of the
stock options, bonuses and unvested pension benefits
that Gary Wendt will receive when he retires from GE in 10
years.

Her attorneys said she will essentially get that in a
tax-free payment of $2 million ordered by the judge,
as well as the payoff of the $1 million mortgage on the
Stamford house by her former husband.

This is one of the few divorce cases of a wealthy couple
that has actually gone to trial. Most of the super rich
settle outside of court.


In the 18-day trial one year ago, Lorna Wendt testified
that her contributions to the marriage were as valuable as the
paycheck her husband brought home, and that while she
ran the household and raised the Wendts' two daughters,
she also worked side by side with her husband as an adviser,
business hostess, traveling partner and
representative to various charitable and community groups.


Gary Wendt denied his wife contributed to his success,
saying in court that she had no interest in business and
wasn't interested in his problems, leaving him very lonely
in the marriage.

Each Wendt hired a public-relations representative.
The Tierney's chambers have been inundated with calls from
the media for months.

Lorna Wendt has started a Web site -
www.equalityinmarriage.com, named for the Foundation for
Equality in Marriage that she is starting with some of her
assets.

When they married just after both graduated from the
University of Wisconsin, the Wendts had $2,500 between
them, according to Lorna Wendt's representative.



To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (1559)7/4/2000 2:44:43 PM
From: Tunica Albuginea  Respond to of 4155
 
Articles on Gary Wendt and GE Capital:

From The Nightly Business Report

an Interview with Gary Wendt of GE Capital


sixsigmaqualtec.com

The Nightly Business Report Transcript—an Interview with Gary Wendt of GE Capital

Susie Gharib:
Gary Wendt runs the profit engine that brings good earnings
to life for General Electric (NYSE:GE). It's called GE Capital and does business
around the world. Darren Gersh asked Wendt about the world economy and cutting
costs in the service sector. It's part of the Business Week CEO Summit, the new rules,
mastering the challenges of a new economy.

Darren Gersh, Nightly Business Report Correspondent:

I think a lot of investors would be
surprised to learn that GE Capital supplies about 40 percent of GE's profits.
What is GE Capital? And why is it so important to GE?

Gary Wendt, Chairman & CEO, G.E. Capital:

Well, I think the answer to both of those will help any viewer who doesn't know that
GE Capital provides 40 percent of the profits to General Electric.
But that it does so through a whole range of activities that really doesn't put
us in that category, called financial services, for instance. Now we operate in these satellites.
Financial services? No, probably not. The yellow trucks that you see going down the
road that say Penske on them. Those are really a part of GE—GE Capital.
So we do a lot of things.
Yes, we finance things so we're in financial services.
But we do a lot of other things, as well.
The point is, don't think of us as a financial services company.
Our multiple deserves a lot more.

Gersh:
Well, in the course of your business, you deal with thousands of companies
around the world. You know a lot about them.
Do you see any signs of a global recession right now?

Wendt:
As of now, it's still isolated to places that we all know very well.
We know about Russia. We don't have a thing there so, so it's not of any concern to us.
In Asia, we had very small investments, minor concern. And they're clearly having deep
recessions in Korea, Indonesia, Thailand. But when you put those things together,
that isn't very much of the world's economy. I mean, places like Mexico.
It still has a good economy. People are worried about Brazil and Argentina.
Economies going along just fine. I was in Eastern Europe and checking on our
activities in Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary, and they say things are
going just fine. Obviously, there's a lack of an inflow of new capital, because people
are watching. But as far as their consumers and their banking activities,
delinquency in our portfolios, all just fine.

Gersh:
Well, you've seen opportunities in Japan and you've been making
acquisitions there. Why, and what are you buying?

Wendt:
Japan is an opportunity because it's the second largest economy in the world.
And until very recently, we haven't been allowed to participate.
That's all you have to know. Even if their economy isn't too good,
the chance to go in and participate for the first time is just exciting.

Gersh:
Well, what can you buy now that you couldn't buy a couple of years ago?

Wendt:
We have been able to buy finance companies that provide consumer loans.
We've been able to buy the infrastructure of an insurance company that will provide
savings products. And we are talking, and this has been announced that we're talking,
and that's all we're doing at this point, trying to buy a business that finances commercial companies.

Gersh:
What if the United States does slow down?
If the United States dips over into recession, can GE Capital keep growing at 15 percent a year?

Wendt:
Yes, we'll be able to do that in the tough times.

Gersh: How?

Wendt: Well, because in tough times is when we find opportunities
—more and more opportunities. For instance, in Japan.
People think that's a tough-time economy today. For us, it's the best opportunity we've seen,
maybe in history. And those situations exist. So, people that continue to look for new things
to do aren't going to have a problem. If you're doing the same thing you always have,
and people want less of it, it's obvious you're not going to do so well.


Gersh:
One last question. I understand that G.E. Capital is now applying
the efficiency principles that GE has used in its manufacturing
businesses to services. What results have you had there?

Wendt:
We're having success and basically just getting started in doing that because,
because at the surface of the 6-sigma activity is a need for everyone to be involved,
which is called culture. You know, everyone, if six of the people want to do things better,
but the seventh doesn't and they're in the process, it's not going to get any better.
So a part of what we're going through all over GE now is the cultural change to get
everybody bought in. And the training change so that everybody expands.
Now we've had some early hits. I mean, we can process a credit card now 30 percent faster
than we ever could before because of the 6-sigma activities. Ten years from today,
the list we'll have to give you about the things we do better will be much longer than you want to listen to.

Gersh:
And a billion dollars in savings?

Wendt:
Billion dollars in savings, for us, over the next three years.

Gersh: Mr. Wendt, thank you.

Wendt: You're welcome.

----------------------------------------------------------

From Slate:

" GE: Dressed for Succession "

slate.msn.com

GE: Dressed for Succession
By James Surowiecki

Posted Thursday, Dec. 10, 1998, at 7:20 a.m. PT

Gary Wendt's resignation as head of GE Capital points up perhaps the most important thing
about GE's success over the years: its careful management of succession.
In 12 years at GE Capital, Wendt transformed that division from a small credit arm with assets of $24 billion
into what effectively was one of the world's largest banks,
embracing 29 different businesses and controlling $300 billion in assets.
Wendt's aggressive investing style and managerial style allowed the division to account for 40 percent of
GE's overall profits, and provided the kind of internal diversification that almost no large company has anymore.
And yet his departure provoked no crisis among GE investors or within the company.


That's because GE has created a corporate culture where the company really
is larger than the individual. That may seem like an odd thing to say when
GE's public image is so connected to that of its CEO, Jack Welch, who's often
heralded as the man who saved the corporation. But while Welch did transform GE
in the 1980s, cutting jobs while dramatically improving productivity, he did so not to
"save" the corporation but rather in anticipation of a newly competitive business world.
When Welch took over GE, the company was in fine shape. His predecessor had
actually just been named CEO of the Year in a Gallup Poll (who knew they took
Gallup polls about topics like that), and had spent seven years planning for his own succession.

More than that, as James Collins and Jerry Porras point out in their book
Built to Last, essentially every GE CEO has been successful. GE's return on equity
under Welch has been stellar, but by the company's historical standards not outrageous.
The company's emphasis on ensuring that top managers are developed in-house and
groomed for the top--often through a fiercely competitive process--has ensured that
no one sits in the CEO's chair who's suddenly going to announce that GE is going into the movie business.

In this context, the clearest signal Wendt's departure sends is that Wendt himself
was not a candidate for the CEO's job, which is unsurprising when you consider that
he's already 56 and that he and Welch are not the best of friends.
And while it may seem strange for a company to have one of its best performers
step down while he's still doing great work,
GE's entire history encourages it to make
decisions early rather than later. Welch wants no chaos when he retires two years from now,
no conflicts over succession. He's installing a younger team of executives at the very top,
one of whom should be the next CEO. It's an unusual, and unusually successful, way of doing business
in these days when more and more corporations look outside for saviors.



To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (1559)7/4/2000 6:49:57 PM
From: brad greene  Respond to of 4155
 
Article

Jack,

That 6/30 article was from a press conference I believe held in Carmel.

Handshaking and photo shoot.......not for discussing business. If CNC has a deal already, it will be announced first......then discussed with analysts on a conference call. If they are looking at a couple of offers or ways to go....Wendt will discuss this with analysts this week.

I don't believe Wendt has met with analysts yet.

The press conference was for journalists......it was a business event where no business took place. Herbert Hoover would have been proud!

bg



To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (1559)4/18/2002 10:45:01 AM
From: Jack Hartmann  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4155
 
Wow! I owned this before. Alot shorts on this. Maybe a swueeze should be in order :P

Jack