SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dan3 who wrote (105236)7/4/2000 3:46:23 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
AlibiDan - Re: "It's only one data point, but I'd guess it's more direct knowledge than you have."

Sure, Lewinsky, sure !!!

Intel sells the MOST FLASH of any producer - and if they had a problem, they would have been out of business by now.

Paul



To: Dan3 who wrote (105236)7/5/2000 3:28:55 AM
From: John Walliker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Dan3,


My understanding is that AMD flash carries a premium over Intel because it supports more cycles.


AMD 1.8V 2M/16 Am29DS323D claim 1000000 write cycles

Intel 1.8V 2M/16 28F320D18 claim 100000 write cycles

For a disc controller that is only reconfigured a few times the difference probably doesn't matter.

The crappy flash chip has a big "Intel Flash" logo on it, so there is no doubt who made it.

It's only one data point, but I'd guess it's more direct knowledge than you have.


It may not even be one data point. How do you know for certain that the programming algorithm had been correctly programmed, or that some other problem caused the failure to update?

John