SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Pangea Goldfields T.PGD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: timbouctou who wrote (1130)7/4/2000 4:08:06 PM
From: Enigma  Respond to of 1178
 
If that is correct - ie. that Barrick's lawyers have asked for a freeze on info - it is highly improper because it withholds full disclosure from Pangea shareholders who are being asked to tender. In particular Barrick should issue up to date results from Golden Ridge where it is the operator. The official line from Potvin - as told to me on the morning of the Barrick offer is that assay results are delayed because of 'backlogs at the labs'. So which version is true - Barrick's lawyers or Potvin's version? How many months is it since we've had drilling results?



To: timbouctou who wrote (1130)7/4/2000 4:19:15 PM
From: terryswift  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1178
 
Of course. Barrick wouldn't want great drill results screwing up their low-ball offer. Since they control Golden Ridge, they can hold those results; however, given the situation, Enigma is right; that may constitute a willful attempt to defraud PGD stockholders.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News