Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Insitu who wrote (47496)	7/6/2000 3:40:59 PM
From: John F. Dowd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

BAloney: They were cut off any time they wished to make a point. They also had to play by Jackson's rules and format. Lastly their witnesses were supposed to remember EMails written months and years before. The MSFT lawyers were their to defend the tying and harm to consumer accusations. It was a foregone conclusion what side Jackson was on. The trial was a farce. The lawyerly skills begin in a real court - spelled Appeals- not that thing that Jackson called Court. The Queen of Hearts would have been fairer. Histrionics and dramatic confrontations don't cut it in business law. JFD