Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scott_jiminez who wrote (35605)	7/5/2000 3:42:43 PM
From: Pink Minion	Respond to of 70976

Yup, I clearly remember all those folks bitterly complaining about the Merrill report last week. Well, because that was end of the month and quarter - classic paint tainting. Why didn't SSB release their report last week? I do get your point, though I find this timing suspect.

To: scott_jiminez who wrote (35605)	7/5/2000 4:00:44 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Respond to of 70976

If you want to tailor the law so that the firm cannot sell securities after a Sell recommendation, fine with me. Their being able to profit off an opinion which sends the market into a nosedive stinks no moatter how one looks at it. BK

To: scott_jiminez who wrote (35605)	7/5/2000 4:03:04 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Respond to of 70976

If you want to tailor the law so that the firm cannot sell securities after a Buy recommendation, fine with me. Their being able to profit off an opinion which sends the market into a nosedive stinks no moatter how one looks at it. BK