SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hoa Nguyen who wrote (119319)7/5/2000 3:58:32 PM
From: dougSF30  Respond to of 1578531
 
I'm unclear about exactly what the Quiet Period prevents. Didn't stop CPQ from refuting their negative SSB report.

And Toni's email implies that they could, if they so desired.

Doug



To: Hoa Nguyen who wrote (119319)7/5/2000 4:17:35 PM
From: Goutam  Respond to of 1578531
 
Hoa Nguyen,

> Isn't AMD in a pre-earnings release black out period? Doesn't that mean they can't say anything, including refuting an erroneous report?

Black out period, ro quiet period before earnings release is mostly a self-imposed restriction. There no SES requirement of Quiet periods.

Now as far as Doug's Hope of AMD repudiating SSB downgrade - AMD can't repudiate them for having long term bearish view. Same goes for SSB's comments on Flash. Compaq repudiated them because they made a direct comment about Compaq inventory in the channel. Of course, AMD can issue a statement that they are on course with their earlier guidance.

Goutama



To: Hoa Nguyen who wrote (119319)7/5/2000 4:31:54 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1578531
 
Isn't AMD in a pre-earnings release black out period? Doesn't that mean they can't say anything, including refuting an erroneous report?

SEC rules are fairly clear according to Tad Lafountain....anything of a material nature that may effect the movement of the stock must be released immediately whether there is a so-called 'quiet period' in effect or not.

ted