Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : VD's Model Portfolio & Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: biowa who wrote (8067)	7/5/2000 9:23:07 PM
From: scott_jiminez	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9719

"biowa" I could answer your questions directly, clearing your confusion point by point, without hesitation. However, while retracing my steps (and with the recent accusation of spamming in mind), I was struck by the following: this entire discussion, from my perspective, began with post #8045. In the intervening 30 or so posts, my stocks (symbols censored for riot control purposes) along with those mentioned by some other posters, were posted at most 4 or 5 times. For this I was accused of spamming. During this same period, Incyte, in name or symbol, was mentioned at least (I lost count) 30 times. 30 INCY citations and no comment. 4 or 5 Ariad (or whatever) citations and I get taken out back. Talk about confusion! Spamming quantification must be a non-parametric statistic. I get accused of spamming for companies I follow while the entire raison d’êtreof my posting here - the excessive focus on a narrow list of stocks (in fact a single stock of late) - is completely ignored. It is more than ignored...it's condoned. That's not confusion. That's a double standard.