SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (46596)7/5/2000 9:40:26 PM
From: Rich1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Hey Dan3 do you know what today is. It is July 5,2000.
The date of VIA unequivocal committment to DDR is April 10, which is over 3 months ago and before this deal was made.
Lets keep our facts honest and story straight. thank you.



To: Dan3 who wrote (46596)7/5/2000 9:40:33 PM
From: Rich1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Hey Dan3 do you know what today is. It is July 5,2000.
The date of VIA unequivocal committment to DDR is April 10, which is over 3 months ago and before this deal was made.
Lets keep our facts honest and story straight.We thank you.



To: Dan3 who wrote (46596)7/5/2000 10:02:28 PM
From: The Prophet  Respond to of 93625
 
As usual, Dan3 "overlooks" an important aspect of the press release:

Dan3's "spin" is "Intel gives go ahead to VIA on DDR chipset for Pentium III!"

Dan3's quote is:

"Intel Corporation and Via Technologies, Inc. today jointly announced that the companies have reached settlement of pending litigation related to a cross license between the two companies.... Via is licensed under Intel patents to produce P5 and P6 chipsets"

Actual language of press release (Dan3's omissions capitalized):

"Intel Corporation and Via Technologies, Inc. today jointly announced that the companies have reached settlement of pending litigation related to a cross license between the two companies.... UNDER THE MODIFIED AGREEMENT, Via is licensed under Intel patents to produce CERTAIN P5 and P6 chipsets."

Draw your own inferences.

biz.yahoo.com



To: Dan3 who wrote (46596)7/5/2000 11:34:08 PM
From: richard surckla  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Dan3... I think the other posters here have answered your post sufficiently. No need for me to chime in. But thanks for the SPIN attempt. Always good for people to be kept on their toes.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News