SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (119409)7/6/2000 12:25:41 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578937
 
Pretty staggering to see how far out in front Intel is in this server market. Not just blowing everybody else away in pure performance but also blowing everybody else away in price/performance. This is the market AMD wants to enter if they can ever get a SMP system working. It's quite remarkable that AMD hasn't even got a 2-way system working with what they claimed was a far superior EV6 architecture. Intel's supposedly inferior P6 bus architecture is blowing away everything in sight. Could it be that AMD wasn't completely honest when they made their bold claims about EV6 "superiority"? If it's so superior how come they still can't get it to work? Food for thought....

Intel has never shipped a single P6 generation chipset die that wasn't at least 2-way SMP capable. No one has ever shipped a single K7 generation chipset die that was.

biz.yahoo.com

tpc.org

EP

EP



To: Elmer who wrote (119409)7/6/2000 4:53:33 AM
From: Bill Jackson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578937
 
Elmer, Intel entered the chipset market to make money. They found it not as profitable as they thought it would be, nor as easy to dominate.

Bill



To: Elmer who wrote (119409)7/6/2000 8:43:57 AM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578937
 
Elmer,

If you remember back to when Intel entered the chipset business big time, 5-6 years ago, it was to ensure availability of high performance, reliable chipsets so that the processor shipments wouldn't suffer. The fab capacity required to manufacture those chipsets is considerable so why tie it up when viable alternatives are now available?

It is possible that Intel and AMD are going to have similar strategy regarding the chipset business.

Joe