Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lucretius who wrote (2549)	7/7/2000 1:11:37 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

And you thought it was MER ...<VBG><p> <a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/000710/invest.htm" target="_blank">http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/000710/invest.htm</a> >>For someone prone to compulsive gambling–and an estimated 4 percent of the population is–even catching a glimpse of CNBC, with its scrolling stock ticker and nonstop financial chitchat, can be tough. "I have a TV," said a Gamblers Anonymous attendee named Chris, "but I don't let myself see the devil channel."

To: Lucretius who wrote (2549)	7/7/2000 1:17:07 PM
From: pater tenebrarum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

i know. the only problem with that is that so far not one of the Puetz forecasts has come true. on the contrary, he's one of the most accurate contrary indicators alive. see his 'crash and burn' post of yesterday, coming right at the intraday lows. the market has frenetically rallied ever since. so i would interpret his indicator exactly the other way around. whatever it says will happen, expect the exact opposite to happen.